Thomson Delmar Learning Online PDR Resource Center  

Home   |    Contact Us   |    About Us    |    Press Releases     |    Site Map


Shop Product Catalog
Drug Updates

Bonus Monographs

RN Magazine Highlights

Related Products

Drug Links

  Pharmaceutical
  Companies


  Government
  Resources


  Miscellaneous
  News Groups


 



 
WHAT'S NEW IN DRUGS
from RN Magazine, June 2003

Staff Editor: Emil Vernarec
Reprinted by permission. RN Magazine is published by Medical Economics, a Thomson company.

Archives

2003
May
April
March
February
January

2002
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

 


A Quality Of Life Advance For Chemotherapy Patients
A new type of antiemetic called aprepitant (Emend) gives cancer patients extended protection against nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy, including high-dose cisplatin. Standard protection has centered around 5-HT3 antagonists such as ondansetron (Zofran) and granisetron (Kytril), which are approved to prevent nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (acute phase). Aprepitant is the first agent approved for preventing nausea and vomiting in both the acute phase and the delayed phase, 25 - 120 hours after chemotherapy. Aprepitant has a unique mechanism of action, selectively blocking P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors in the brain, which appear to play a role in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Aprepitant is taken for three days as part of a regimen that includes a 5-HT3 antagonist and a corticosteroid such as dexamethasone (Decadron). Aprepitant may affect plasma concentrations of certain medications, including some chemotherapy agents, warfarin (Coumadin), and oral contraceptives. Closely monitor prothrombin time in patients on warfarin, especially in days seven to 10 after the first dose of aprepitant.

U. S. Food and Drug Administration. "FDA approves new drug to combat nausea and vomiting for cancer patients getting chemotherapy." 2003. www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2003/new00886.html Merck & Co. "Emend (aprepitant)." 2003. www.emend.com (10 Apr. 2003).

New Class Of Drug Against HIV Gets Accelerated Approval
The FDA has approved a new class of drug for use in combination with other agents to treat advanced HIV-1 infection. Enfuvirtide (Fuzeon) is indicated in adults and children ages 6 and up who have ongoing evidence of viral replication in spite of treatment with other antiretroviral agents. Enfuvirtide is the first "fusion inhibitor," so called because it blocks the fusion of viral and cellular membranes and thus interferes with the entry of HIV-1 into healthy CD4 cells. Studies of its long-term effects are ongoing. Patients will need to be taught to watch for symptoms of pneumonia, which was more frequent in subjects who had enfuvirtide added to their anti-HIV regimen than in those who did not. In trials, nearly all patients had at least one local infusion site reaction and 17% had a reaction that lasted for more than seven days. Serious systemic allergic reactions may occur. Complete details on the new drug are available at www.fuzeon.com.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "FDA approves first drug in new class of HIV treatments for HIV infected adults and children with advanced disease." 2003. www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00879.html (17 Mar. 2003).

Antibiotic Labeling Must Warn Of Risk Of Bacterial Resistance
The FDA has announced that by February 6, 2004, labeling for systemic antibiotics must carry statements telling providers about the risk of resistant bacteria developing if these drugs are used inappropriately, and advising them to counsel patients about this risk. The reminders-including one right under the headline of the product name-will caution that the antibiotic is to be used only for infections that are proven or strongly believed to be caused by bacteria. Providers will also be reminded to consider culture and antibiotic sensitivity information when available. Patients are to be advised that their antibiotic is effective only against bacterial, not viral, infections and that they need to take it exactly as directed. Explain that skipping or not completing the prescribed regimen reduces the effectiveness of the antibiotic and raises the chance of bacteria developing resistance.

U. S. Food and Drug Administration. "FDA publishes final rule to require labeling about antibiotic resistance." 2003. www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2003/new00869.html (10 Feb. 2003).

Gleevec's Use Is Expanded In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) has been approved for first-line treatment of adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The drug was initially approved in May 2001-after an accelerated three-month FDA review-for patients with advanced stages of CML and as a second-line agent for patients in the chronic phase following the failure of interferon-alpha therapy. Imatinib is now approved as a first- or second-line agent for patients in any stage of CML. Imatinib targets an enzyme that produces the rapid growth of white blood cells in CML. In a trial comparing it with a combination of interferon-alpha and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) in 1,106 patients with chronic phase CML, those on imatinib had significantly less cancerous cells in their blood and bone marrow. Imatinib also appears to have reduced disease progression at one year. The most common adverse effects include nausea, vomiting, edema, muscle cramps, fatigue, skin rash, and headache.

U. S. Food and Drug Administration. "Gleevec approved for first line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)." www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2002/new00860.html (7 Jan. 2003). O'Brien, S. G., Guilhot, F., et al. (2003). Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med, 348(11), 994.

Help Reduce Adverse Events In Elderly Outpatients
About 40% of elderly outpatients use five or more medications per week-a factor that increases their risk of having an adverse drug event (ADE). But many ADEs are avoidable, according to a recent study. Researchers examined the records of 27,617 elderly patients for a 12-month period and identified 1,523 ADEs, 421 of which were deemed preventable. Though most avoidable errors had no long-term effects, five patients died. Preventable errors most often occurred in the prescribing (58%) and monitoring stages (60%) of care. (In tracking a single ADE, it was possible to spot the error at more than one stage and to identify more than one error in a single stage.) Preventable errors also occurred when patients did not follow directions (21%). This, say the researchers, underscores the importance of careful patient instruction.

Gurwitz, J. H., Field, T. S., et al. (2003). Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA, 289(9), 1107.

Modified Rapamune Regimen Improves New Kidney Function
A study of kidney transplant patients has shown that early withdrawal of cyclosporine from a regimen that includes sirolimus (Rapamune) can significantly improve renal function and blood pressure without increasing the risk of organ rejection. Labeling for sirolimus now includes this new regimen, but it's recommended only for patients who are at low-to-moderate immunologic risk of organ rejection. Patients should be started on the standard three-drug immunosuppressive regimen-sirolimus, cyclosporine (Sandimmune, Neoral), and corticosteroids-but have cyclosporine withdrawn two to four months after the transplant. The sirolimus dose is then increased to recommended serum concentrations. In the study, graft survival at three years was 91% with the modified regimen vs. 85% in those who stayed on cyclosporine.

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. "FDA approves new indication for Rapamune." 2003. www.wyeth .com/news/pressed_and_released/pr04_11 _2003_16_04_31.asp (18 Apr. 2003). U. S. Food and Drug Administration. "FDA approves new Rapamune labeling likely to improve transplanted kidney function." 2003. www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/answers/2003/ans01211.html (18 Apr. 2003).

Pain Clinic
Which Triptan Is Best For Your Migraine Patient?
Q
Your patient tells you that while her current triptan is effective in treating her migraine attacks, her headaches return fairly often. She asks whether a different triptan would help more. What can you tell her?

A Tell her that another triptan may, indeed, work better for her. A recent review of the research found that migraine recurrence rates varied by the triptan used, ranging from 17% - 40%. It appears that the longer a triptan's half-life and the higher its potency for certain receptors in the brain, the lower the recurrence rate. Of the seven available triptans, the review found that frovatriptan succinate (Frova) 2.5 mg, naratriptan HCl (Amerge) 2.5 mg, and eletriptan hydrobromide (Relpax) 40 mg had the lowest recurrence rates. Eletriptan was approved late last year. In a large, placebo-controlled study, eletriptan 40 mg was compared to sumatriptan succinate (Imitrex) 100 mg. Researchers found that more eletriptan patients reported having mild or no pain at two hours (67% vs. 59%, respectively) and fewer of them had a recurrence (31% vs. 37%). When it comes to your patient, tell her that a recurrence can happen with any triptan, but the likelihood of that happening can vary by the particular triptan she's taking. Ultimately, only her own "trial" can tell which is best for her.

Geraud, G., Keywood, C., & Senard, J. M. (2003). Migraine headache recurrence: Relationship to clinical, pharmacological, and pharmacokinetic properties of triptans. Headache, 43(4), 376. Mathews, N. T., Schoenen, J., et al. (2003). Comparative efficacy of eletriptan 40 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg. Headache, 43(4), 214. THE AUTHOR MARY J. SCHOLZ, RN, PhD, is a nurse clinician and behavioral medicine specialist at Northwest Psychophysiology, an affiliate of Northwest Neuroscience Institute in Seattle.

Error Watch
This is the first in a series of bimonthly columns that RN will offer on preventing drug errors. It will feature actual cases reported to the Center for the Advancement of Patient Safety (CAPS) at the U. S. Pharmacopeia, along with analysis and recommendations by CAPS staff.

A Series Of Slips Led To This Drug Mix-up
Borrowing drugs, not confirming a verbal request, and not knowing a weekend protocol paved the way for this "Serzone/ Seroquel" mix-up reported anonymously to the U. S. Pharmacopeia's Medication Errors Reporting (MER) Program.* A patient's dose of the antidepressant nefazodone HCl (Serzone) was being gradually reduced. On a Friday, a 200 mg tablet was dispensed, along with two 100 mg tablets to be used as the tapered doses for the weekend, when the pharmacy was closed. The patient was inadvertently given the two 100s on Friday, leaving the weekend nurse with only the (unscored) 200 mg tablet. Forgetting that extra Serzone was kept in the night cabinet on weekends, the nurse asked a colleague to borrow a 100 mg Serzone tablet from another unit. The colleague thought she said "Seroquel"-which is the antipsychotic agent quetiapine fumarate. Seroquel (in 100 mg tablets) is what she borrowed, and that's what the patient got for two days. Come Monday, the colleague called the pharmacy to get more Seroquel for the patient-and the error was caught. The patient suffered no harm, but the drug could have caused seizures and excessive orthostatic hypertension, among other reactions. This mishap teaches the importance of several safety measures, such as having a "no borrowing" policy, posting reminders on procedures when the pharmacy is closed, alerting staff to easily confused drug names, and rechecking verbal requests for medications.

*MER is presented in cooperation with the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. THE AUTHORS DIANE D. COUSINS, RPh, is vice president of the Center for the Advancement of Patient Safety (CAPS) at the U. S. Pharmacopeia. MARSHA PROTZEL, RN, BS, is quality control/quality assurance analyst at the center.